Dr. Barbara Ziv told the jury during Harvey Weinstein’s hearing in Los Angeles when she was summoned by prosecutors on Tuesday to testify about the “myth of rape” that “rape is not a crime.” “What we see on TV.” There is a social belief about rape and sexual assault.
Ziv told the jury that the rape victims’ behavior was “untrue” that “most of what people believe is inaccurate or factual.”
Ziv is a psychiatrist and licensed physician who specializes in all aspects of sexual assault, assessing the behavior of victims and perpetrators. Throughout her decade of medical care, she has worked with more than a thousand victims of sexual assault, but had no connection to the Weinstein case and did not work with Jane Dos, who allegedly was the victim. The tragedy of Weinstein’s abuse.
Ziv testified as an expert in Weinstein’s first criminal trial in New York City in 2020, as well as Bill Cosby’s 2018 sexual assault trial in Pennsylvania.
Ziv stood for hours. Following her presentation to the jury, Weinstein’s defense attorney Alan Jackson examined Ziv at length, focusing on the differences between the legal and medical definitions of abuse and consent.
“You have testified about the myth of rape … it is very general about conduct,” Jackson said, to which Ziv replied, “I came here to educate you about the truth about rape.” “Sexual assault.”
Ziv was represented by prosecutors called experts to strengthen their case. It is expected that later in the trial, the defense will also call on doctors or medical professionals to weigh in on memory loss and other issues that will give the jury a different perspective on Ziv’s studies and road work. Mind.
The memory is complex, Ziv explained to the judge and the victim of the rape, keeping the memory of the “middle wound” forever, but the smaller details of the attack – such as the date, time, what the perpetrator wore, etc. – May be lost. Over the years.
“If people do not report immediately, they say they do not remember years later,” Ziv said. “It’s not that they are lying… people are trying their best or they are trying to remember.”
Ziv explained that while police sometimes use those “memory problems” to say that victims are not credible, that is changing as awareness of victims of abuse has grown over time. Recent years.
As part of her show, Ziv broke the “myth of rape” by telling the jury that most of the behavior that people would assume the victim of rape was untrue, according to psychiatrists. Who specializes in sexual assault.
Ziv said rape often occurs among acquaintances, although most people believe that rape is usually committed by strangers. “Most people are raped by someone who knows them,” she told the jury. She explained that while “rape of strangers” occurs, most sexual assaults involve acquaintances in certain capacity, unlike the representations commonly seen on television and in movies.
The psychiatrist told the judges that the victims of sexual abuse did not resist their abuse, although most people believed they would retaliate. “Most individuals are not against it,” Ziv said. “Even shouting and shouting are not as common as we think. … This is opposition. “You think that if you are abused, you will fight back.” “The important thing is that this is not the case,” she added.
During the contest, Jackson asked Ziv if “someone hit back.” She answered “some” and then continued, “Do some women fight back? Sure. The myth is that it is common. Jackson then asked, “Are some of you screaming?” Ziv answered the same, answering “some”.
Ziv told the judges that victims of sexual assault usually do not report immediately, although most believe they would go to the police if they were raped..
“Sexual assault is an unreported crime,” Ziv said. “Even if they report, they are rarely prosecuted.”
She explained that when victims report abuse, it is often not to the authorities, but perhaps to friends or family members, but it is normal to never say anything. Ziv says there is “a large percentage [that] “Never tell anyone in their life.” “Shame” is the reason many victims do not talk about their attacks, but there are many reasons why they do not, “she said. “It’s a very difficult topic to discuss.” “They are afraid of responding or invading their private lives or being classified as adulterers or liars,” the psychiatrist added.
Ziv told the jury that the behavior of victims who were sexually assaulted after the rape, whether happy or sad, did not indicate whether they had been raped. “Attitudes after sexual assault are volatile,” she said. “You can not tell whether an individual has been sexually abused based on the outcome of their behavior.”
Ziv explains that victims of sexual assault often resume contact with their perpetrators after the attack, noting that the common belief is that victims of rape will not see or speak to the perpetrator. Their abuse again. She testified that most people saw their perpetrators again and may be willing to keep in touch with them for various reasons.
“People work in the same circle,” she suggested, explaining that victims may not want their friends to know. What happened. “It was a shameful experience to be sexually assaulted by someone who knew you.”
Reasons why victims of sexual assault may talk to their perpetrator after “they want to make sense of it” or they want an apology. Relationships often occur because the victim fears retaliation and “collateral damage”, especially when the perpetrator is in power. “When the perpetrator spoils other aspects of your life … those things affect your trajectory forever.”
Ziv also told the jury that it was normal for victims of sexual assault to reach an agreement with their attackers later. “Many times people feel like they are just broken goods and no one will want them, so they start acting like broken goods.”
Jackson accused Ziv by asking, “Do some people escape their attackers at all costs?”
“Yes,” she replied.
And when he asked, “Some people go to the police immediately? “Some,” she replied.